Dailies Contact Lenses

Did you know that you can tell everything on CNN is False by looking around in the Real World?

This is why FOX News is the only REAL News.. it is only called "Faux News" by Liberals. Think about it. CNN makes Obama look like hes done more in 3 months and a year than ANY President has EVER done.. and its just crap! Fox SHOWS you how phony it is, how numbers are Manufactured.. and all CNN can say, daily, is "Bush Did It..." This is proven False Numerous times, as some would say, Obama's Birth Certificate.. This is how we feel about the Bush argument, its simply not true. Id post links.. but you cant do that in Questions anymore. /// well, IF everything was so WONDERFUL as the Obama Glee Club (CNN) Says.. People wiould have Jobs... .. Approval Rating would be Up... etc, etc, etc. But CNN is NOT TRUE! I believe liberals dislike Fox because we tell it how it is. This, in turn, draws attacks on Palin, and the network.. but we just WON NJ, Mass, and VA.. and soon to be Illinois! The People are Speaking with VOTES. These are Facts, and I am not a Stupid American. Agreement?

Public Comments

1. My god your a stupid american
2. Not false.... far short of truth...
3. Been drinking that Koolaid again, have you?
4. Disagree. CNN may be biased to the left, but Fox News being biased to the right does not make it real news. It just makes it another biased news station. Fox has also been repeatedly caught reporting news that was not true. Their newspaper ad accusing CNN of not covering the DC Tea Party immediately comes to mind. The photo they used in that ad actually came from a CNN camera.
5. "These are Facts, and I am not a Stupid American" You want to know something funny.... we got Fox in Australia and I started watching it...I assumed it was a joke network...seriously..no one could be so right wing racist and get away with it without it being ironic humour...; But then I found out it was an actual "news" network... And that made me laugh even harder...really...what sort of person with a brain could believe that Fox was unbiased? But since then I have noticed that Fox viewers do not have a brain... That is quite unfortunate. And the funniest thing is that Fox, as a tool of the republican party... supports the rich and the elites...and trashes the working class and the poor... And yet... the working class and the poor ..support Fox... Honestly..the working man is his own worst enemy.
6. I am very conservative and I promise you that fox news is NOT "real" news, ok? Hunny, get a life. Don't be one of these dumb-as@ed individuals ! OK? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUPMjC9mq5Y
7. Did you know you can tell what is true by NOT watching ANY news? I make a habit of avoiding news broadcasts and newspapers so when a story does come up I haven`t been conditioned, my mind is not contaminated, I am able to judge with as much biasness removed from the picture. But when I do happen across the news, let me tell you, FOX is some of the most attrocious mind garbage out there. Two Pew surveys were conducted; one showed that the majority of FOX *ahem* News viewers were the LEAST informed when it came to national and international matters. The second showed that the majority of FOX *ahem* News viewers were Republican. Go figure. And you are a stupid American. Too stupid to know how the Q&A format works here, you soap-box ranter.
8. Palin gets attacked because she lacks intelligence in her field. Furthermore, votes do not constitute general intelligence. As for potential cures for the current predicament that the U.S. is experiencing, it is hilarious to find that every network has a solution. The next decade will be an interesting ride.
9. why do you people watch that chit cnn and fox are jokes its like a 24 hour head ak
10. Your 100% correct. If you watch a number of different new shows and compare their reporting to CNN you will have missed a great deal of what is actually happening in the world around you when it comes to the failings of the present administration.
11. You betcha.
12. CNN tries to pretend they have no liberal bias and then they employ someone as crude as Anderson Cooper who dismisses tax protesters with the term "teabagging" Who can take CNN seriously Oh Cooper did apologize, sort of, when pressed on the issue, 5 weeks later! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6TecmKi_Hg
13. The job loss rate is now LESS THAN 2% of what it was when Bush left office. The stock market has now regained nearly 60% of its value back. Housing has stabilized everywhere and has recovered in a number of places. And gross domestic product for the last two quarters were UP 3.5% and 5.7% respectively. And what is even more amazing, Obama did this while drastically CUTTING the deficit. Upcoming will be proof of that. First up are Republican numbers (which focus on deficits), then the Democrat numbers (which focus on budgets); but both are covered. And no matter which number set you choose, they BOTH find Obama cutting spending by hundreds of billions of dollars. And if you have a problem with this, just remember that the Republican numbers come from Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity. I just did the math for you. If you have a problem with it, tell those three to quit lying so much. If you trust them, then trust their numbers, and by extension trust what those numbers say--Obama CUT spending. Here's the proof. Enjoy! ________________________ REPUBLICAN NUMBERS: According to Republicans, Bush's deficit last year was $400 billion, and Obama's this year was $1.42 trillion. However, what one must remember is that the government's fiscal year ends on Sept. 30th, and the new one begins Oct. 1st. Well, in mid-September of last year, Bush attempted to get a $700 billion bailout passed. He failed. It was defeated by House Republicans. So Bush added $150 billion in REPUBLICAN PORK to attract those votes. That works, and the Republicans cave and pass the now $850 billion bailout. But they did it in October; AFTER the new fiscal year, Obama's fiscal year, had already begun. In other words, Bush's bailout is counting against Obama. So now we must take Bush's bailout away from Obama, and add it back to Bush. --All numbers in trillions-- $0.4 (Bush's initial deficit) + $0.85 (Bush's bailout) = $1.25 trillion (Bush's ACTUAL deficit). $1.42 (Obama's initial deficit) - $0.85 (Bush's bailout) = $570 billion (Obama's actual deficit). $1.25 (Bush's deficit) - $0.57 (Obama's deficit) = ---$680 billion (Obama's savings from Bush's spending)--- ____________________ DEMOCRAT NUMBERS According to Democrats, Obama's budget for this past year was $3.4 trillion. For 2008, Bush's budget was $3.1 trillion. However, this leaves out some info. First up, deficits. Each President has to deal with the budget deficit/surplus from the year before. Well in 2007, Bush left himself a $500 billion deficit to deal with. Certainly large, but not even half as large as the budget shortfall he left Obama--$1.4 trillion. That is a $900 billion advantage Republicans give to Bush by ignoring previous year's deficits. In addition, Bush left out the costs of both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars in all his budgets. The estimated cost of Iraq was $3 trillion; Afghanistan was $1 trillion. But we are only working with one year budgets, so we only need one year totals. Iraq was estimated last year to cost $10 billion a month--$120 billion last year. Afghanistan was $2 billion a month--$24 billion last year. We add the yearly totals to find what needs to be added to Bush for the costs of the wars for 2008--$144 billion. We add Bush's bailout back to him for the same reason we had to do so in the Republican numbers--$850 billion. We subtract Bush's bailout from Obama for the same reason we had to do so in the Republican numbers. But we must also add the costs of the stimulus ($787 billion) and the omnibus ($410 billion), since they are not included in Obama's budget. --all numbers in trillions-- 3.1 (Bush's budget) + $0.9 (Bush's deficit advantage) + $0.144 (Bush's war costs) + $0.85 (Bush's bailout) = $4.994 trillion (Bush's actual spending for 2008). 3.4 (Obama's budget) - $0.85 (Bush's bailout) + $0.787 (stimulus) + $0.41 (omnibus) = $3.747 trillion (Obama's actual spending for 2009). $4.994 (Bush's spending) - $3.747 (Obama's spending) = $1.247 trillion (Obama's savings from Bush's spending). But while this number does take into account Bush's deficit, it does not take into account Obama's ACTUAL deficit of $570 billion (as found in Republican numbers). So we must now take that deficit away from Obama's savings. $1.247 (Obama's savings) - $0.57 (Obama's deficit) = ---$677 billion (Obama's ACTUAL savings on Bush's deficit)--- ___________________________ So with Republican numbers, we find Obama saving $680 billion; with Democrats numbers it's $677 billion. A difference of only $3 billion, which can be accounted for by the fact that our numbers are estimates in the trillions of dollars. Which means that our number estimates were within a 0.001% margin of error.
14. Television and the Media in general is like this. I'm glad you're waking up.