Dailies Contact Lenses

Why Can't Daily Mail Readers Leave Comments On Vincent Tabak Court Appearance?

I'm sure many would like to leave this real piece of filth some words.

Public Comments

1. Whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty". Or would you have lynched the landlord too?
2. maybe it is to do with the fact that he isn't a "peice of filth" until he is convicted?
3. Because Daily Mail readers don't desevre the opportunity to speak when they're so poorly informed. He's innocent until proven guulty in a court of law, and so far the evidence is not standing up very well to serious scrutiny.
4. Please if the Daily Mail had their way you'd have a state not dissimilar to Stalin's - Sham trials where innocent people are tortured because they look dodgy and forced to confess and then executed. The Daily Fascist is only enraged because the suspect is a Dutch national
5. As many have answered, he is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Secondly, he's an educated man, what on earth would he be doing reading the Daily Hate? Or is it now the choice paper of people on have been charged with murder?
6. Still not convinced about him
7. they don't want to get the blame for Scottish hotheads going on there and saying that he is already guilty, thus risking the integrity of the case.
8. no comments can be left on any article until the trial is over
9. The Daily Mail readers,why?? I mean,really.